Azaeroe

I think that whole "standing out" thing really depends on the kind of people you're trying to get. The kind of guys I like tend to be shy to the point of being intimidated by that. I'm pretty shy around new people myself, and personally, I would much prefer it if someone went up to me and said "hello" instead of "what did you eat for breakfast this morning" or something along those lines. Granted, I get that just a simple greeting might come off as bland to most, but if they're not expecting it, it could actually be the best way to go about it, provided you have something to follow up with and gradually build it up.

Tinder is great, and just like irl using it requires a certain finesse and understanding of the code of conduct that applies there. You can’t just walk up to every 10 on the street and be like ”hey baby do you like dir en grey?” and expect them to care. My tip is to set yourself apart by expressing yourself and being a little weird. That way you’ll automatically eliminate all the basic bitches from the equation and you’ll remain with the peolle you’d actually fuck with, with who you share interests and a sense of humour. 
 
Tinder is objectively a million times better than daygaming random people like a jerk off creep or rubbing yourself against someone’s ass on the dance floor.

Yes

btw love how this headline implies that the girl got her p!$$y p*pped and pooped out a baby all while still in her wedding dress 👌

4th single, "murder disease", will be released on May 31"th"
 
 

Ariabl'eyeS - 響奏輪廻ローゼンレネット
八方不美人 - 愛なんてジャンク!

ジルドレ (jirudore) first single will be released on August 5!
 

bump, it's today!!! ♥♥♥

There is no such thing as a "shy" girl. Are you out of your mind or just completely blind?

T
O
R
N
A
D
O
 
O
F
 
S
O
U
L
S

There was a pretty German girl in my class, and I used to draw illustrations of her all the time, until a teacher saw and told her.

😊

She met up with me, got me real drunk, then started insulting me, by calling me a virgin, and those kind of things. She also described, metaphorically, how she made love to another boy, in order to aggravate me. I sort of liked it, though. I wanted her to dress in Bundes Deutsche Maedel outfit and beat me up, while insulting me 😊

There was a pretty German girl in my class, and I used to draw illustrations of her all the time, until a teacher saw and told her.

I think I actually have this lying around somewhere. I have something by him, anyways. Pretty sure it's this. IIRC, it has my favourite poem in it (I'm not normally too big on poetry, but I can make exceptions).

The Last Days of New Paris by China Mieville
 

Tbh, I have little to no idea what you just said purely because my tiny mind can't comprehend this level of articulacy, but I have exams coming up. How much would I have to pay you to disguise yourself as me and sit them for me?

Art which possesses neither public responsibility, nor aesthetic originality, is a very humble form of art. While for much of history, the concept of art did not yet exist, it is clear that there were works of art being produced. It may even be said that art came naturally to the rhapsodes who were later collectively referred to as Homer, when (initially) composing the lyrical interludes of the Iliad, and later making the whole poem lyrical. But these works necessarily laid emphasis on the side of themselves which were τέχνη, until the event of early Romanticism, as defined by Hamann and Herder, in opposition to Kant. It was not until Yeats' middle period that the idea of a unifying system of public responsibility (τέχνη) and aesthetic originality (art) became proper. Since the deaths of Eliot, Pound, Bunting, and others, High Modernism has been reacted against, by the humble Romanticism of gentlemen like Larkin (in England), and the Post-Modernist experiments of gentlemen like Ashbery (in America). My theory is that this is both caused by and contributing to the general downfall of our society, since verse used to, and no longer does, bother to influence society, in any meaningful manner. Until this idea has been revitalised, there may as well be no art at all, considering it simply stands as a kind of cask-monolith, pretending to do what it does not itself even understand.

Art which possesses neither public responsibility, nor aesthetic originality, is a very humble form of art. While for much of history, the concept of art did not yet exist, it is clear that there were works of art being produced. It may even be said that art came naturally to the rhapsodes who were later collectively referred to as Homer, when (initially) composing the lyrical interludes of the Iliad, and later making the whole poem lyrical. But these works necessarily laid emphasis on the side of themselves which were τέχνη, until the event of early Romanticism, as defined by Hamann and Herder, in opposition to Kant. It was not until Yeats' middle period that the idea of a unifying system of public responsibility (τέχνη) and aesthetic originality (art) became proper. Since the deaths of Eliot, Pound, Bunting, and others, High Modernism has been reacted against, by the humble Romanticism of gentlemen like Larkin (in England), and the Post-Modernist experiments of gentlemen like Ashbery (in America). My theory is that this is both caused by and contributing to the general downfall of our society, since verse used to, and no longer does, bother to influence society, in any meaningful manner. Until this idea has been revitalised, there may as well be no art at all, considering it simply stands as a kind of cask-monolith, pretending to do what it does not itself even understand.

Art which possesses neither public responsibility, nor aesthetic originality, is a very humble form of art. While for much of history, the concept of art did not yet exist, it is clear that there were works of art being produced. It may even be said that art came naturally to the rhapsodes who were later collectively referred to as Homer, when (initially) composing the lyrical interludes of the Iliad, and later making the whole poem lyrical. But these works necessarily laid emphasis on the side of themselves which were τέχνη, until the event of early Romanticism, as defined by Hamann and Herder, in opposition to Kant. It was not until Yeats' middle period that the idea of a unifying system of public responsibility (τέχνη) and aesthetic originality (art) became proper. Since the deaths of Eliot, Pound, Bunting, and others, High Modernism has been reacted against, by the humble Romanticism of gentlemen like Larkin (in England), and the Post-Modernist experiments of gentlemen like Ashbery (in America). My theory is that this is both caused by and contributing to the general downfall of our society, since verse used to, and no longer does, bother to influence society, in any meaningful manner. Until this idea has been revitalised, there may as well be no art at all, considering it simply stands as a kind of cask-monolith, pretending to do what it does not itself even understand.