Jump to content

nullmoon

Veterans
  • Content Count

    1427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by nullmoon


  1. I agree with plantanity; I don't really get how this is some sort of come back for giru. It sounds like something off Now but a tiny bit heavier. The first two tracks are forgettable but takt is pretty good.

     

    On a side note, just listened to Music for the first time in ages today and it's actually a fantastic album.


  2. @kurenaishineek - Sorry, in regards to Crossfaith I meant I wanted to separate it from Western artists. Clearly they sound alike but I like to separate the music of different countries into different genres.

     

    Oshare Kei and Nagoya Kei are really easy to distinguish so how come there aren't more?! I read up on Angura Kei recently which seems to sum up bands like Kagrra nicely, and yet according to some people bands like Girugamesh are Angura Kei?


  3. I feel sorry for them. They make softer music for a change, probably due to their record label, and then people bitch about it. They then change it up to appease listeners and then the fans still bitch about it.

    Apart from SOME of the vocal work in their new phase, I honestly don't see what the problem is. Especially when loads of VK bands out there have much worse vocalists.

    I personally love the new era and I can even tolerate the poppier albums. In comparison I found Play Dolls boring as hell :)


  4. Thanks for your responses guys and for confirming that I'm not alone :D

    It's really weird because I remember reading Zess' post which essentially pointed out that VK is more of a subculture (if anything) rather than a genre of music. As a result I assumed that there were some kind of super secret genres that I was missing, but I guess I was mistaken.

     

    So basically...

     

    The term 'visual kei' is not a genre of music, yet due to the complexity of the VK scene this term is the only way to encapsulate the form. Due to the sheer amount of genres being used, there is only one genre (which is in fact not a genre) which can describe this ever changing style and that is, confusingly, visual kei! :D


  5. Hi guys,

    I've been listening to Visual Kei for years now but I still have absolutely no idea how to 'genre-ify' (is there a word for this?! Categorise I guess?) 99% of it. I'm totally cool with categorising Oshare Kei and Nagoya Kei because they're the only types I really feel comfortable labelling. With stuff like Crossfaith, I just bung it into a 'J-Metal' folder so as to distinguish it from Western stuff.

     

    However, I have a ton of bands who I don't know how to categorise. As a result I simply put them under Visual Kei, which according to this site is highly incorrect! Some guidance on the following bands would be really appreciated!

     

    -Bands like Kagrra

    -Bands like Kra

    -Bands like Alice Nine

    -Bands like Versailles

    -00's bands which had a lot of shouty stuff (early NoGoD, Ayabie, Lolita23q etc)

    -Bands like Alsdead/Deluhi/old Lycaon/Heartless etc

    -Bands like new Lycaon

    -Bands like D'espairsray

    -Bands like The GazettE, who I guess sorta links to Girugamesh now?

    -DIR EN GREY!!! (I guess they are in a genre of their own? People say their older albums are similar to old VK but I just don't see it. Were many bands doing songs like Myaku?!)

    -Older bands like Luna Sea, Glay etc

    -Copycat bands like Grieva (would they be the same as above?)

    -Miyavi...?

    -Punk bands like The Piass

    -Rentrer en Soi? What would they be...?

     

    Sorry, this is pretty messy but any help would be great! It would be cool to put a genre on shuffle and not come across songs that have nothing in common. 


  6. I don't really know what to say...this album was actually very, very good. After hearing the lacklustre single, I reckoned this album would be balls but I was SO wrong. Classical Element is pure brilliance and features enough variety to cater to all tastes. I was really impressed with Zin's vocal work after listening to the album actually; the single does him no justice whatsoever.

     

    I'm not really a fan of making track by track reviews but I must say that every song on here is worth a listen. To me, absolutely none of it is filler. For a first album I think it is simply incredible and on par with some of Versailles' older work. Despite listening to this album once I'm happy to give it an 8/10, which will probably grow to a 10/10 by tomorrow.

     

    As a side note, both Jupiter and Kamijo as a solo artist seem to be making heavier music than late-Versailles. It's reminiscent of early-Versailles and I love it! Do you reckon their label forced them to tone down the harsher riffs and vocals? After listening to Jupiter's first single I was under the impression that they wanted to make flowery music still, but the album proved me wrong.


  7. I agree with RpgRiser, his voice could be a bit quieter. I was a bit disappointed that the single wasn't as heavy as I imagined it would be, but it's still closer to early-Versailles than Jupiter.

    I won't do a track by track review but I think the single is worth a strong 7/10. A very positive start for Kamijo's solo career.

    After listening to this single I realised that his voice is what essentially carried Versailles and made them unique. This is perhaps why I found Jupiter's single so underwhelming.


  8. I'm going to be in the minority here but I thought Quiet was the best track on here! Heck, even Forbidden Beaver wasn't bad! Although it starts off as a shameless Love Addict rip off, the guitar work is nice. The solo is far superior to the one in the title track.

    Fadeless is far too generic; although it's tighter than Forbidden Beaver, it's lacks any kind of wow factor that's usually associated with A-Sides.

×
×
  • Create New...