Tony 1 Posted December 3, 2010 9 tracks is way too short? How can you even say that? Lulz, what a retarded statement. Jeez! 9 tracks, probably average each song is probably around 4 mins long. That's 36 minutes worth of songs. That is including the ones we have heard already. That is too short. I think MUSIC was around that long. As the 9 song album is the limited edition. They always take a few songs out for the limited edition with the DVD. With 'Opening' being an intro, album is only 10 songs long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nick 10212 Posted December 4, 2010 Bad tracklist. They don't include "the foolish mindcore" on it. t(-_-t) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Des 289 Posted December 4, 2010 Bad tracklist. They don't include "the foolish mindcore" on it. t(-_-t) I lol'd Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 5, 2010 the guitarist looks exactly like this: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maiku 4 Posted December 5, 2010 LOL if Girugamesh were a PSC band Shuu would have left the band because of "creative differences," or in what we'd call "too ugly." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-D-eadStam_aliv-E- 0 Posted December 6, 2010 Dont be mean guys >.> even though it could really happen if they were in PSC but shhh... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LIDL 692 Posted December 6, 2010 hm seems EU edition offers better business,a regular tracklist (11 songs) with DVDs from limited included also. That's so cool! No, notice that the EU edition is 2CD and not CD+DVD. The EU Edition including the bonus CD DISC 2 from Limited Edition and not the DVD. oh! i see that. That still O.K for a business, though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LIDL 692 Posted December 15, 2010 Cover Arts: Regular Limited Just can't be anymore creative, i see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anieresus 270 Posted December 15, 2010 LOL Guess they wanted to match bad covers with bad music. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miasma 162 Posted December 15, 2010 lol, I thought that bulb baster-looking thing was a vuvuzela! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LIDL 692 Posted December 15, 2010 lol, I thought that bulb baster-looking thing was a vuvuzela! i thought it was a boom boom car! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xDaInReUx 0 Posted December 15, 2010 God this is going to suck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShanethVarosa 1209 Posted December 15, 2010 .......*facepalm* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karma’s Hat 3107 Posted December 15, 2010 Those covers are so bad it's ridiculous. I mean my god! That could be from my second grade English book, only thing missing is a catchphrase that promotes equality. I really think that this time they can surpass the awfulness of MUSIC, as long as there are songs as bad as Colors in there, they can make the new epitome for shit. Edit: Sorry for the ridiculous typos Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Bacon 106 Posted December 15, 2010 They will surpass Now. Maybe even Music. This already qualifies for worst as the year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-D-eadStam_aliv-E- 0 Posted December 15, 2010 Agree with everything above. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jurideluhi 6 Posted December 15, 2010 The cover art does suck(really hard) but I know their music would be awesome. Fingers crossed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
11:1 0 Posted December 15, 2010 OMG GUYS COVER SUCKS CAN'T BE GOOD. Wow... You've gotta be kidding me guys. The album art for their self-titled was a wall with graffiti on it. Was it better because it had a darker tone to it? Hang on a sec... Really guys, it's just a cover... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nekkichi 6043 Posted December 15, 2010 Still can't beat THIS: I mean their art-director knows how to make a shitty design they have learned to add some terrible music over the years took them some time, but they can pull some godawful shit these days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LIDL 692 Posted December 15, 2010 to be fair, they never have any really good cover arts. But, i consider their self title and Music cover arts to be most bearable. Indeed they need to consider to fire their art director. It's been awhile. This one for GO just plain boring. And srsly, cover art is the first thing people will judge whether or not they have to buy a CD in record stores. If you like a specific band that is different thing, as you will keep buy it anyway regardless the crappy cover art. And it does matter, if not, these record labels wouldn't bother to hire many peoples and spend like stacks of money to design and make some of these "just cover arts" they may as well sell it the way it is, without cover arts. Without lyrics sheet. Just plain like blank CD-R packaging. Srsly. Edit: Forgot to add, for some bands, cover arts also can be use as a way to represent the main idea for songs in the album. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShanethVarosa 1209 Posted December 15, 2010 to be fair, they never have any really good cover arts.But, i consider their self title and Music cover arts to be most bearable. Indeed they need to consider to fire their art director. It's been awhile. This one for GO just plain boring. And srsly, cover art is the first thing people will judge whether or not they have to buy a CD in record stores. If you like a specific band that is different thing, as you will keep buy it anyway regardless the crappy cover art. And it does matter, if not, these record labels wouldn't bother to hire many peoples and spend like stacks of money to design and make some of these "just cover arts" they may as well sell it the way it is, without cover arts. Without lyrics sheet. Just plain like blank CD-R packaging. Srsly. Edit: Forgot to add, for some bands, cover arts also can be use as a way to represent the main idea for songs in the album. Thank you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Peace Heavy mk II 7200 Posted December 15, 2010 I'm not a fan of them, but that cover isn't that bad. It reminds me of Eye-Spy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PIZAZ 238 Posted December 15, 2010 Agreed with everything Chianti wrote. Truthfully Girugamesh has always had terrible cover art, but this definitely takes the cake. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wind 195 Posted December 16, 2010 Man, just about everybody is drinkin' hard from the haterade for this one lol. I actually liked COLORS, and Inochi no Ki was meh, but it had good B-sides. If girugamesh can keep momentum, they can actually manage to beat out NOW. Mainly because NOW sucked, and MUSIC was actually good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShanethVarosa 1209 Posted December 16, 2010 I actually liked COLORS, and Inochi no Ki was meh, but it had good B-sides. If girugamesh can keep momentum, they can actually manage to beat out NOW. Mainly because NOW sucked, and MUSIC was actually good. I liked COLORS and inochi no ki, I think the actual musical content of the album is going to be not bad... album name and art is just terrible, but people need to look past that and just listen to the album to make judgements. Even judging specific track titles is better than the art and name. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites